![]() Think tank media mentions related to US military support for Ukraine (Quincy Institute, 6/1/23). It also “initiated meetings with Defense Department officials and congressional staff to push for the recommendations” of military funders. (See, 3/4/22.) Both think tanks receive hundreds of thousands of dollars from Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, companies which have already been awarded billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts as a result of the war in Ukraine.ĬSIS was revealed in a New York Times expose ( 8/7/16) to produce content that reflected the weapons industry priorities of its funders. The Atlantic Council has long been the brain trust of NATO, the military organization whose expansion towards Russia’s borders was a critical factor in Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine. Both of these think tanks receive millions from the war industry. With 157 mentions each, the top two think tanks were the Atlantic Council and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Quincy’s analysis found that the media were seven times more likely to cite think tanks with war industry ties than they were to cite think tanks without war industry ties. Of the 15 think tanks most often mentioned in the coverage, only one-Human Rights Watch-does not take funding from Pentagon contractors. The Quincy Institute-whose own start-up funding came mainly from George Soros and Charles Koch-looked at 11 months of Ukraine War coverage in the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, from March 1, 2022, through January 31, 2023, and counted each time one of 33 leading think tanks was mentioned. arms and the Ukraine war are from think tanks whose funders profit from US military spending.” Quincy Institute ( 6/1/23): “The vast majority of media mentions of think tanks in articles about U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |